Hi @K4uLinalM ,Please check whether you get this issue sorted when you add both customers under parties tab of the object you have under scope tab. Thanks & Best Regards,Nethmini
Hi @HoiIndikW ,Please refer the below idea : Thanks,Nethmini
Hi @PMGannon , @EmerentiaC ,You will get this error if you have deleted the relevant planning line for this purchased part. It is functionally not correct to delete a planning line once a Purchase Requisition is created. This is corrected in 23R2 and you will be not allowed to delete the planning line after this correction. Possible solution at the moment would be to cancel the current purchase order line, create a new purchase requisition related to the fifth part, and create a new PO. Hope this will solve your issue !Thanks ,Nethmini
Hi @lamaus ,What is the Service Update customer is using ? I just checked in 23R1 SU9 and noted that, event PCM_CALENDAR_GENERATION is available. Did you use the same user with the same permission set to check the above in different environments ?Thanks,Nethmini
Hi @lbarber ,Please elaborate more on your requirement. Ideally serial parts stored in inventory can be seen under the Serial Maintenance Aware page. Functionality here is to make it possible to carry out maintenance tasks on serial parts which are not yet located in the facility, by setting ‘Maintenance Aware’ to true.Therefore, it is not possible to delete records from this page. As far as I know you cannot have duplicate records in this page. Serial Parts have unique serial numbers and you get only one record per each. Thanks,Nethmini
Hi @Aravinda.Pr ,Please check whether the logged in user has a Person ID connected. If not please create a Person record for the logged in user and check if that solves the issue. Thanks,Nethmini
Hi @CorGreggB , When you have performed a new issue or a new return from Retrospective Work Reporting only cost lines are generated in Work Order and this is the functionality even in the IFSCLOUDRetrospective work reporting page is designed to report any maintenance activity that was not planned prior to execution. Therefore, when you are directly issuing material from the Retrospective Work Reporting, it means that you have not planned this prior to the work and it is correct to not to have Material lines under the work order. Material lines are generally created when we are planning the work order.Similarly you are returning a part during or after execution of a job that was not planned. Therefore, directly cost lines are generated.Hope this clarifies your doubts on the standard behavior.Thanks & Best Regards,Nethmini
HI @geirsigve ,How you are going to report the issuance of the part before creating a retrospective work report.If you are using retrospective work reporting to report the issuance of the part, it will create the work task cost transaction with the inventory transaction at the same time. Therefore, the changes made on the quantity on hand is reflected in the inventory. Thanks & Best Regards,Nethmini
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.