Hi Tenecia, When we copy a project, we see all related task details also been copied correctly as below. After coping the project to another from this screen image could you help to advice which parameter you are refering as QTY as well as the UPD you are in. Regards,Peshala.
Hi Gayan, Please find the Outcome of from our latest UPD. Copy a project activity where you have some transactions. make sure to define a estimate for a cost element. The newly created activity will have a value in the cost with the estimate value. But the setimated tab is not empty. Regards,Peshala.
also when you delete the estimate in copied activity below will be remaining which can be a bug in the system.
Hi Gayan, It will be better to create a support case for further Investigations, Hope it will provide a solution for the issue. Regards,Peshala.
Hi Bhakthi, As per the user guide regarding replication I found that Resource cost elements should be replicated from onshore to offshore. But when it comes to project Cost it is not a replication entity currently. Hence for future developments you can add an idea with regard of project cost Regards,Peshala.
Hi Elath, I too agreed with bjorn. If you looked into the labor class of employee, you will be able to observe the Use HR Schedule and also a Calendar ID might have been added. If you removed the Calendar ID and recreated the manufacturing clocking it will booked on the correct date! Regards,Peshala
Hi Dasuni,Serial reservation can be done for a deliverable item after creating the material plan and the reservation will be transferred to the supply as well. The design intention of reserving the serial number in material plan is to use the serial number in the material supply. Therefore, when cancelling the material supply the serial number is also get cancelled as there is no material supply for the part and at the same time this serial number cancellation enables the reserving of that serial number for another item in the structure. Regards,Peshala.
Hi Ushan, Handling of phantom parts in a Shop Order which is originated from project deliverables is different to its handling in a manufacturing Shop Order. Even though the Phantom Part No is displayed on the manufacturing shop order material line for parts which have both planning methods K and P, in project deliverables originated shop order the Phantom part No is displayed for structures with Phantom parts which are planning method K (blow through) and are Std Planned Items. That is a designed behaviour which have been developed considering the usage of project deliverables and it has functional differences contrast to manufacturing. Hope this clarify your question. Regards,Peshala.
Hi Sujeeth, Hope from Projects window in Aurena your expectation will be covered. Regards,Peshala.
Thank you @Elath @Peter Lundgren for the answers. Now I am clear on the concern.
Hi Thushan, I see similar behaviour in our lates environmnet as well. Hence it will be better if you can send a support ticket to Investigate the issue further. Regards,Peshala.
Thanks for the Update
Hi,@Thej Could you try genertaing calender by backdating as well and see still the issue is existing. Regards,Peshala.
Hi SMANUEL Are you referring the scenario after RMB and generating roles assignment in Roles assignment tabRegards,Peshala.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.