Hi, We did solution for IFS9 currently we are working around IFS10.If you need more details please contact with me directly on my mailmarek.brzoska@3cit.pl/Marek
We started with the developing for clients in IFS 7.5 and IFS8, but the solution is based on the standard (Audit intefrace) and can be transferred to IFS10 /marek
Thanks :)
I also hope so, because I am involved in this mini project :)If you have any additional question you can contact me directlymarek.brzoska@3cit.pl regardsMarek Brzoska
I think so you have to ask IFS. This SAF-T is optional. In my opinion, you do not have to report it. As far as I know, you only need to send it when your local authority asks for it, but you have 6 months to do so.This is some kind of transition period.I'm not a specialist in this field (I'm from Poland :) but I talked to a Romanian partner who explained to me how it works.Best Regards/Marek
Hi, Due to this obligatory we (IFS Poland) already started with preparing solution for some polish customers which have Plants in Romania.This is not standard, so we do it as a additional service. /Marek
Hi,You are right. Using automatic proposal you can not create the partial offset :(Additional issue is that you can not provide the real payment date, you have to use sysdate. It is important for interest invoice calculation. /Marek
Usually I use this one
Thomas Peterson of course :)
I was speaking with Thomas Karlsson he proposed that we can use solution form other countries ( for. Poland because it should be similar) but it is not ready solution.
Thanks Tomas,I use it Audit Interface Assistance for Poland i Lithuania., I would like make it in the same way for Romania but this Customer unfortunatelly use IFS7.5 . :( but I will consider how to make it as similar solution.Maybe let you know when I will find any solution :)/Marek
Hi,Today I got similar questiona bout SAF-T in Romania. My customer asked me about “where we are ?”.Do you know something more abut this issue ? I know that it will be mandatory since 01.01.2022.We use it in Poland I hope that will be similar.
Hi, Thanks for help I did the verification again and noticed that they changed some parameters.That’s why it has been reposted. Just last question, there is no option ( basic data ?) to turn off this automatic posting ? /Marek
I am wondering where is the base for reposting code string ? When I did WOISS M50 it takes the posting from Posting Control ( it is Ok) but for reposting it takes different account and the question where can I posting control for this last row. It takes from the object ? project ?
Hi, Check the template maybe you missed a column? or you have a wrong separator ?
Hi Kalpa,I have already verified the solution, thank you for the tip BRMarek
I will let you know tomorrow morning. BRMarek
Thanks, I will check.
Hi Thomas,Thanks a lot ! You saved me a lot of work :)
Nice to hear you Adam :)Yes I have and I use Follow Up Material as a polish extension.In that case I can probably use the cost account from parallel postings on cost accounts. ( In version IFS10 these rules named : M281. M282/3/4 . I will consider it. /Marek
Thanks Adam, I used a similar solution in IFS8 using PerCosAll, I will probably do the same now.Marek
yea, it is ma fault should be PEPPOL
working :)
Thanks, now it is wokring.
You can try to enable it from SQL, I did it but the opposite direction to hide the paraller.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
