Hi @aprough, Two users cannot concurrently login to the application using the same account, this is the correct behavior. When a user logs into the system, an entry will be created in FND_CLIENT_LOGON_TAB. As long as the entry is there, you cannot login to the same IFS account from a different machine with a different OS user. This entry will be deleted once the user logs out or after the configured HTTP session timeout elapses and after that, you can login as the same user from a different machine. Default value for this timeout is 5 minutes and you can configure it from IFS Middleware Server Admin Console in IFSAPP10. If the user got kicked out then that should be because the user was idle for some time and this timeout was reached, which would remove the record in FND_CLIENT_LOGON_TAB. When the next user attempts to login, it would enable them to login since there is no record in this table for the account. So extending the timeout might solve your problem to some extent. Hope t
@Hans Andersen . Apologies; I have this figured out. Like the OP, I had a requirement to calculate the bucket level costs and the variances for a large number of Shop Orders. Since IFS only does those calculations when the SO is called up in the Shop Order Costs screen, I was trying to find a way to do it “behind the scenes.” I had found the API call that I needed using Debug Console (and that you mention above) but could not figure out how to create a loop or other “wrapper” function to get it to do it for all SOs. However, I was finally able to create a Migration Job that uses the information in SHOP_ORD table to call the API. Roundabout way to do it, but it works like a charm. My last response above was my solution in case anyone else needs to do something similar in the future.
Thank you @PRODQ . I was able to get this to work by setting up a migration job. Basically, the migration job uses SHOP_ORD as the Source and then uses the API call to run the process.
@PRODQ did you ever get this resolved? We are running into the same situation and though @Hans Andersen ‘s idea is great, I cannot seem to get the wrapper working.
Was there any solution to this? We are running into the same situation. No email is generated.
@anmise . Thank you; that worked perfectly! I was working through this process but running into a situation where I had two different methods (one to return the objid and one to do the close_order_line_) which was not working. I had no idea I could skip that for something like this.
@GPIE . I have not (actually didn’t know I could). I will see if I can figure that out. Thx.
So, is there no way to actually get Customer Orders to auto-close on a scheduled basis?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
