Hi @XitLokesY Searched for documentation, but could not get the same from help files. There is no direct help to this Here is slightly more info, from what is already explained above. Imagine two warehouse users - one with a need to only perform reservations, and another with need to perform the transactions, but not reservation. They can be defined within the warehouse access, as shown below Note: Once we use this function, for a particular warehouse/site, the Third set of users , who can perform both reservation / transactions on this warehouse, should also be defined, if they exist. More in person, if need more info. Please connect :-) Regards Vivek Hey @VivekBhandiwad / @Vimukthi Mahakumbura Any more information on this ? Is this available Out of the box in Cloud, without requiring the global extension/localization at company level ? I’ve set a user in this screen as a test, that is supposed to only be able to reserve from a Warehouse, but no issue (so no transactions,
It’s a bit of a mystery for sure Ok I actually finally figured it out with some extra investigation. Just documenting the details in the event any IFS user comes across this community post in the future and wonders about the same thing we did: By default, out of the box, if you have no Custom Event Action for sending email, when you print a report and select the “send to email” option, IFS creates an Application Message to send the email out, with this message of the PDF File being ready.If the user that requested the print has no SMTP_MAIL_ADDRESS Property set (Against their User/User Properties record), it defaults the sender to the default sender associated to the MAIL_SENDER being used (typically MAIL_SENDER1)If the user DOES have an SMTP_MAIL_ADDRESS Property set, it tries to set the sender to that SMTP Mail Address using the “Send As” functionality on the default account for MAIL_SENDER.In my case, MAIL_SENDER1 is obviously configured with a specific “generic” no-reply type Mail
Also like I said, it happens for a few different users and a few different reports. For instance, Shipment Delivery Notes as well: The top one is the customized one that I am expecting the recipient to actually receive.The bottom one is some sort of Automated one that not every user gets, and that I can’t seem to replicate either.
Did you ever figure this out ? I have the same problem. Some users (not all, like I am not affected for example) are receiving the “PDF file for Purchase Order report for result key xxx is ready” when they Print a Report. This is not limited to Purchase Orders but happens for other reports as well. I do have a PDF_REPORT_CREATED event action which does send a customized email, which I (and my users) ALSO receive as expected, but some of them receive this “PDF Is Ready” Email in addition to it, and I can’t figure out what controls that behavior ?! For example, one of my users, when she RMB > Prints > Send Email To > Herself ends up getting two emails : If I do the exact same steps, I only get one email, the top (customized) one. My users don’t want the automated email one, they just want the customized one, but I can’t figure out what to change to disable that automated “is ready” one?Again, like @jdoherty said, there is not a secondary event action or anything like that set u
Permission set filters are strictly used for mobile. Thank you Anmise, Could you elaborate as to why we even have the ability to add a permission set filter to a projection if it doesn’t actually do anything ? I’m not talking about adding a Perm Set Filter to an Activity, but truly to a projection, the same projections used by Aurena. Why let us create/add one if it doesn’t do anything ?
I know this is old, but if anyone has figured out whether this is possible, I’d love to know. I have seen that IEE Lets you add Permission Set Filters to Projections.Does it actually work/do anything though ? Can you apply a filter to Projection for the Aurena client to restrict the data being retrieved from a list, for example ? In my case, I’m trying to add a filter to restrict the results being brought into ProjectMiscellaneousPartsHandling/ManualReserveMaterialVirtual to specific inventory locations I can create a permission set filter on that entity, but it finds no Columns in the column picker, and even attempting to test whether it does anything at all, I added a 1=2 Clause in the filter, but that didn’t seem to do anything, the Aurena user with that perm set is still getting all results from that projection. So in short: Does adding permission set filters to Projections actually DO anything ?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.