We have an issue in Applications 10, and apparently it exists also in Cloud with following settings:1. resource group A has cost 0.00, and resource group B has cost 1.002. project activity is created and released3. work order is created and connected to activity4. WO has task Duration 10, and Resource Group B has Qty 105. Activity Shows Planned Hours 100 as it should (duration x qty for B = 100)6. When WO is Released the committed hours on Activity are shown correctly as 1007. When we report 5 hours against the resource line, the 5 hours are reported back to Activity and Activity Gets Hours Progress8. But when hours are reported and resource group A is used (having cost 0.00), no hours are shown on Activity. The committed hours stay as 100, when the expectation was that group A (cost 0.00) should behave as group B (cost 1.00).Any idea, why?
Our customers aggregate inventory transactions and rounddiff+/- are taken place normally. But suddenly for period 2022-12 (year end) the transactions were not created.The setup on site has 0 days.We have a period where ROUNDDIFF do not take place, tough periods before and after they are created normally.Aggregate inventory transactions have been run for period 2022-12 in 4.1.2023 (this created ROUNDDIFFS for period 2022-11). Period 2023-01 has been run on 3.2.2023, but NO ROUNDDIFF were created (and at this time 2022-12 accounting period was closed).Then again once we now ran the 2023-02 period - ROUNDDIFF took place - but for period 2023-1.Still 2022-12 we have 0 qty in inventory with inventory value..Question is what are the prerequisites for ROUNDDIFF? And why is the period 2022-12 having 0 qty with value?
When you have manual voucher with quantity in GL, and you want to cancel the voucher; the accounting information is correct, but the quantity is copied from the original voucher - without reversal / cancelling it. Should it?In comparison, if you create manual voucher and then interim voucher - even the quantity gets reversed.
Procurement authorization rule is defined to use HR data in authorization steps. A person (employee) is found based on preposting information (code part B) from purchase requisition line, and with this correct name is found from HR Position and HR Organisation.The rule works fine, with the exception that Employee Name is not visible on Potential Authorizer view IF the user has not access in HR to those employees.THis creates a problem in procurement where information is needed about the person name.If procurement persons are granted access rights in HR on higher level then names are shown.Question is: when Organisational information is used in PR authorization template, how to present employee names in procurement without granting too heavy access into HR data in HR.Is there an access attribute in HR, that can grant show names for everybody, without revealing any other HR data.
Our EAM customer is looking for a reference how to apply e-Class classification for parts.We do have characteristics and we do have assortment in the application. Have you applied e-Class classification amongst your customers, and if yes - how?(We are running Cloud 22R1)(https://eclass.eu/en)
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
