This document might be helpful for inter-site setup.
Had an own solution to make an InContext Lobby Item (List Type) with navigation to the sales contract.. but thanks for thinking along.
Yes, i have multiple projects… that is the difficulty I encounter.
I'm currently implementing the module in APPS10, but herewith an overview of the module as it was released in APPS9.
This might help a bit with the report rules on how to set it up. Works like a charm at some of my customers, also for sending payment advices automatically subtracting the Email address from the XML.
Hi, This is the Query tool; And I think you need to use the following query in the SQL statement box; This selects the parts that have in OR out > 0. select * from INV_PART_CONFIG_PROJECT_1 where (Inventory_Part_Period_Hist_API.Get_Total_Issued(CONTRACT, PART_NO, CONFIGURATION_ID, Statistic_Period_API.Get_Previous_Year(Statistic_Period_API.Get_Stat_Year_No(SYSDATE)), null) > 0) OR (Inventory_Part_Period_Hist_API.Get_Total_Received(CONTRACT, PART_NO, CONFIGURATION_ID, Statistic_Period_API.Get_Previous_Year(Statistic_Period_API.Get_Stat_Year_No(SYSDATE)), null) > 0)
If you know the SQL query tool in IFS you can see in the System Info in which view you need to look. When you execute Select * from INVENTORY_PART_PLANNING you will get all the data in the table which you can export to excel using a regular output channel. (Figure 1) If you do not want all you can use the query dialog box to add a WHERE clause. (figure 2.1&2) Select * from INVENTORY_PART_PLANNING WHERE planning_method = 'N’ Figure 1 Figure 2.1 Figure 2.2.
I have not used it, but the reaction of the resource tab on the activity it shows the columns you have added as resource criteria. The way I see the use of it, is that you can make a more detailed resource plan f.e. with ResourceID and Report Code to determine which type of cost you’ll be getting. Usually when a customer starts I propose just to use the resource group and after that, if the need is there, add more criteria.
Agreed, little configuration and tweaking of the process will probably always happen. And there will always be enhancement requests. But copying some functionality from the purchase process doesn't really sound like a bad idea ;-)
Seems like something needs to be improved in the core here
On the other hand, if you've considered the contract lost before and restart it; this might also be something to analyse from a business perspective. Instead of using custom event/actions, I would suggest to leave it there and analyze why the decision was made to consider it lost. Reversing it would only trouble your BI statistics and valuable business information.
This might come in handy as well, we have made a “CTO for Dummies” step by step setup instruction. Not really advanced but this is considered a good starting point.
We have the same question at a customer implementing currently, the solution here was to send the AFP as attachment with the project invoice. Sub-optimal but it works.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.