In IFS application complex assemblies can be partially disassembled and assembled as per the business requirement.Work scope is defined from “Define Work scope” screen. It could be defined with maintenance levels and modules and can be further included or exclude as per the business requirement.Once the work scope is released MRO interim order structure will be created according to the defined work scope.In the interim order structure, the disassembly and disposition shop orders are crated only for the selected work scope. Once the disassembly and disposition process are completed, they will be reserved in the corresponding assembly shop order along with the remaining assembly (assembly which was not included from the work scope).The assmbly parts which are not included to the work scope was directly reserved as a partial part in the corresponding assembly shop order.Final assembly shop order will complete the assembly with the partial part and disassembled components.
Hi,How does a user can retrieve the previous results keys for reports run as Quick reports ?Are the report keys are getting archived ?
Hi,When a Repair shop order (Internal repair) or purchase order (External repair) was created through a Disposition shop order in MRO process, this repair shop order will be connected to assembly side of the MRO interim order structureRecently observed that some of the repair shop orders were not connected as above explainedWhen I check the MRO interim order it is in released state parent interim order number also available (where it should be connected to the structure). However, these interim orders were not connected to assembly tree structureI checked if there are any records in the Disconnected Repair Orders tab, but I could not find any records of above explained RSOs, which means they were not disconnected manuallyWhen this issue was investigated technically, we identified MRO interim order data was deleted from backend table while manually disconnected RSO data was still available Any reason why this occurs Thanks
In a MS Level 1 part in Master scheduling After “Run MS – One Part” or per Scheduled Task changes at Forecast 0 or Forecast 1, a necessary recalculation of new forecast is not given.Would like to know your opinion about this behaviorMS Level 1 partRun MS-one part – the forecast is converted in fixed proposalsModify forecast 1 (entered 20 pcs)No recalculations observed without Run MS-one part Start MS-one part but no recalculations observed, where a recalculation is expectedHowever, after changing date of Calculation Date for example to 1/1/21 and recalculating to actual date it works
Hi, How to check who is performing copying cost set to cost set one, since we can only see the time stamping, but no user id.Thank you.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
