Hello IFS Community,After an IFS delivery our http server node cant be started due to:D:\ifs\INSTANCENAME\wls_domain\INSTANCENAME\servers\HttpServer1\logs\HttpServer1.log[2022-11-12T20:44:29.6552+01:00] [OHS] [ERROR:32] [OH99999] [ossl] [host_id: mws-server-name] [host_addr: ip-address] [pid: 12140] [tid: 1096] [user: IFS-Service] [VirtualHost: mws-server-name:48081] OHS:2057 Init: (mws-server-name:48081) Unable to initialize SSL environment, nzos call nzosSetCredential returned 28791[2022-11-12T20:44:29.6552+01:00] [OHS] [ERROR:32] [OH99999] [ossl] [host_id: mws-server-name] [host_addr: 10.110.0.72] [pid: 12140] [tid: 1096] [user: IFS-Service] [VirtualHost: mws-server-name:48081] OHS:2171 NZ Library Error: Unknown errorWe tried to perform a MWS reconfigure in order to re-import the valid SSL certificate, but we’re getting: There a few similar issues in the knowledge db, but none applies 100 % to our situation: Question: What is the trust anchor in this context?Is it the java cacert s
Dear IFS Community, Background:We’re hosting IFS10 UPD8 on premise.It was recommended to us, that we should startup IFS through a Desktop shortcut.That shortcut points to a share on the MWS, where the executable is located: Issue:All users who’re using this method experience - independend if its a buisness notebook or a power pc - very long startup times (30 sec+) and - once logged in - very sluggish behaviour (views loading time, field selection, data search time and so). There are no CPU / HD / Memory / Network spikes neither on MWS, DB nor the client itself. When IFS is being accessed through a webbrowser, then IFS behaves a tad more responsive. (Even though the Web variante brings other issues). Basic question:Is anyone else who is hosting IFS on prem accessing IFS through a Destkop shortcut?And if yes, do you or did you experience similar behaviour? Any pointer into the right direction would be appreciated.BR,Cesar
Hello,We are on IFS 10 with a MWS running WebLogic Server 12.2.1.3.0. Has anyone imported into the MWS a SSL certificate, whose key has been generated using ECC 256 instead of RSA? I’m afraid of potential incompatibility issues. IFS officially only recommmends RSA:https://docs.ifs.com/techdocs/foundation1/020_installation/020_installing_fresh_system/010_planning_installation/020_security_considerations/010_Certificates/
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
