Hi Kevin, thanks for your response! That could be a good idea, but would you be so kind and provide a little more information (indicative/lead) about the RACE environment, please?
Thanks to you too, Nick! Even though it’s good to be aware that such features exist, our temporary conclusion is that an environment which doesn’t involve/allow custom data would be of limited value to us. Subsequently we’re back at where this thread started: Even though we (or rather ‘that other’/the main implementation project) have hooked up with a couple of local/national/regional SIs (System Integrators) who BTW involve skilled former IFS employees, we quickly end up in a fragile situation where we have too few personnel with sufficient insight into the sometimes 2nd or 3rd level implications of design choices available to our team, i.e. a significant project (possibly even enterprise) risk. The fact that IFS has moved onto a more open ReST API-centric path helps a lot, but we don’t see the scarcity of competencies vanish anytime soon. My two cents of personal opinion says that even though IFS invests in their ‘Aurena’ client, a Swagger-like kind of API documentation would help A
I THANK you Jeannine, This served as a quite useful confirmation. We’ve been hoping for/expecting a direction like this, but so far haven’t come across too much «proof» or validation. Membership in the OpenAPI Initiative is precisely the kind of stuff we’d like to see! :-)
Thank you!
I thank you, JoScSe (Tack)!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.