I thank you, JoScSe (Tack)!
Thank you!
I THANK you Jeannine, This served as a quite useful confirmation. We’ve been hoping for/expecting a direction like this, but so far haven’t come across too much «proof» or validation. Membership in the OpenAPI Initiative is precisely the kind of stuff we’d like to see! :-)
Thanks to you too, Nick! Even though it’s good to be aware that such features exist, our temporary conclusion is that an environment which doesn’t involve/allow custom data would be of limited value to us. Subsequently we’re back at where this thread started: Even though we (or rather ‘that other’/the main implementation project) have hooked up with a couple of local/national/regional SIs (System Integrators) who BTW involve skilled former IFS employees, we quickly end up in a fragile situation where we have too few personnel with sufficient insight into the sometimes 2nd or 3rd level implications of design choices available to our team, i.e. a significant project (possibly even enterprise) risk. The fact that IFS has moved onto a more open ReST API-centric path helps a lot, but we don’t see the scarcity of competencies vanish anytime soon. My two cents of personal opinion says that even though IFS invests in their ‘Aurena’ client, a Swagger-like kind of API documentation would help A
Hi Kevin, thanks for your response! That could be a good idea, but would you be so kind and provide a little more information (indicative/lead) about the RACE environment, please?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
