Smart client:
Web client:
Nope, there’s just a messed up date format.
How can we fix it so that the date format is the same on these lobby elements regardless of client?
Are these graphs high?
Userlevel 1
+4
Userlevel 7
+22
HI
I believe that you can simply configure the dttm iso format with a simple sql conversion in the data source designer
You can try this small piece of sql on the column section (replace your datetime field with YOUR_DTTM field). Once the formatting is done, refresh webclient cache and open the lobby up in a new tab
CONVERT(varchar, YOUR_DTTM, 104)
There are plenty of conversion examples in sql date formatting on the web.
ha-ha to the topic btw 😂
Userlevel 1
+4
Hi
The source is the same → the output is different
:-D Yay for good humor during trying times! Dates and formats in FSM are the bane of my existence. (at work anyway)
Userlevel 7
+22
Hi
I thought your main concern was on the datetime formatting because I have already tried this out with the given conversion. Well, I need to check this how it is being formatted differently on the web client & smart client. I assume that this might have been raised by other users as well.
Userlevel 1
+4
Hi
I thought your main concern was on the datetime formatting because I have already tried this out with the given conversion. Well, I need to check this how it is being formatted differently on the web client & smart client. I assume that this might have been raised by other users as well.
Looks like your graphs are … affected, by something, as well. xD
Anyway, we couldn’t find this issue in any other community thread. Maybe it is a bug and not a feature after all?
//Christine
Userlevel 7
+22
Hi
Hahahha the graph is just a demonstration xD Have you tried added the dttm value as an order by statement, by the looks the graph is kind of inverted with datetime order correct? I was unable to find a better reason for this but if none of the suggestions worked, it would be best to log a support case.
Userlevel 1
+4
Hi
Hahahha the graph is just a demonstration xD Have you tried added the dttm value as an order by statement, by the looks the graph is kind of inverted with datetime order correct? I was unable to find a better reason for this but if none of the suggestions worked, it would be best to log a support case.
We will try ordering by dttm, thanks :-)
Case already logged, but smh it takes 2-3 months to get a solution IF it is a bug.
//Christine
Reply
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.