Skip to main content

Dear Community,

 

We have a question related to Cost Bucket “170” and PO Charges.

 

Environment

 

Inventory Part setup (Weighted Average)

 

Cost Setup of the part

 

 

Cost Bucket “170” is defined. (Hoping to capture the Charges of the PO separately)

 

There is a Price and a Charge amount defined for the PO

 

 

 

After receiving 1 qty --> Inventory Transaction looks like below. (Ignore the Delivery Overhead as it is not relevant to the problem).

All the values are fine.

 

Inventory part Unit Cost

 

However, when checking the Inventory part Unit Cost Details, we can see that both the Price amount and Charge has been captured under the Cost Bucket 110.

 

Question is why the Charge amount is not captured under the Cost Bucket “170” and displayed separately here ?

 

 

Thank you

To see bucket 170 the charge must be entered on the Charges tab of the Supplier for Purchase Part.

@matt.watters actually that is already defined. It was fetched to the PO from there.

 

 

@Tharindu Illangasinghe I came across the same issue in apps10. Have you found a solution yet? I’m considering reporting this to IFS.  

@Sadeepa Gamlath Not yet. Couldn’t find a proper reason for this. 

Please let us know if you happen to hear back from IFS. 

Hi everyone,

 

Just posted the same issue here:

 

I believe that total value for charges (any type of charges, you can have many) is always increasing one single “Material” Cost Bucket” - 110 or however defined. Charges will never be visible as separate Cost Bucket because there is no mapping between Charge Type and Cost Bucket.

 

And Cost Bucket 170 is only used for “Part Cost” purposes, calculation for manufactured parts using those materials in BOM. It will never affect ARRIVAL.

 

I’m seeking for workaround, the goal here to see separate rows in Inventory Part Unit Cost, reflecting material cost and charge 1 and charge 2.

 

Regards, Lukasz

Reply


Terms & ConditionsCookie settings