Skip to main content
Question

Employee Payment Information

  • May 16, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 296 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+4

It’s great having Payment Information section in the Employee Masterfile which allows to define multiple bank accounts with different Value Types. However, if the customer uses the Expense Payment process in the Expense Management module, then the bank details needs to be defined under the Property Codes, as the relevant Property Codes has to be connected to the Employee Payment Methods Basic Data. Defining the same information in 2 different places in the employee Masterfile is just a duplication of data and during the data migrations and integrations 2 places needs to be updated. Is there a way to generate the employee payment files by using the Payment Information defined under the compensation data without using the Property Codes? 

 

Thanks

2 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • July 13, 2026

Hi, 

I know this was posetd 4 years ago but I am having the same question. Why do we need to keep the banking information in two places if we are not paying expenses through payroll transfer. 

 

Thanks 


Forum|alt.badge.img+11
  • Hero (Partner)
  • July 23, 2026

It is not mandatory - the payment information screen in the employee file will allow you to store bank details without needing to map to the properties, if only using for payroll purposes.

 

IF you are using IFS to make employee payments / expenses and generating the payment files then you need to map within the payment information template to the employee properties and there is a toggle in the header, which if selected, once you have mapped the property to the field will update the properties automatically . I believe this will at some point be reviewed and that the finance part will look directly at the payment information screen but as before cloud this connection was to the properties this is still required