Skip to main content

Hi,

Historically we’ve always set the place_id_from on Part Usage to that of the FOR_STOCK value of the person record creating the part usage.

 

At the minute we have a number of resources assisting different area’s due to the seasonality of various locations.

We have built a process that see’s the resource is working out of a different location for set days, and as part of this process we’re triggering an update to mobile to perform_replication_for_table_and_person on the PERSON_PLACE Table. When this runs I can check the device and query that table for the data, and it shows correct.

 

The problem I am having is that even though the table on the mobile has been truncated, when the technician is looking to use a part it’s trying to use from the previous place and not the new data that shows after receiving the update.

Am I doing something wrong, or is my understanding of what should happen after invoking that perform message.

 

Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.

 

Ady

Be the first to reply!

Reply