Is someone able to explain to me why there is a cost difference in the roll up of the material costs for this part? The Accumulated Cost for the Estimated Material cost of the component is 0.20374 for 2921-88-2. The QPA for 2921-88-2 for the parent part 2921-88-2_HC-ML is 10. From this you would expect the Accumulated Estimated Material Cost for 2921-88-2_HC-ML to be 2.03740. However, it shows as 2.03742. Why?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.