@martinnc, do you have any info that could help on the above question? Thank you in advance
Thank you @Anjula Priyanath and @Hasara Dinu for the help :)
Hi @Anjula Priyanath , I was trying to avoid duplicating functions, but it seems it is not possible. ThanksJoana
Hi @Saranga Amaraweera, thanks! it is now working after defining the Process Result Mapping. Do you know if it is possible to have more than one Processes with the same/different name and with the same map function associated, the only thing that changes are the process arguments?We have a generic map function that gives the description of a global code value, and we have an outgoing message where we are mapping two fields that have lookups to global_code_table and instead of sending the values to the external system we want to send the descriptions. However, the result is that both fields are sending with the same description that corresponds to the value obtained on the last function that runs. Is this the normal behavior? Kind regards and thanks for the helpJoana Machado
Hi @Saranga Amaraweera , yes we have already tried On Mapping and it does not work. Here is the function:This function is working, the only problem is when we have to handle two task_texts in the message, both will be created or updated with the information that results from the second time the function runs. Kind regards and thanks for the help!
Hi! Here is the relation definition tab: Mapping: Processes Tab:Thanks :) Joana Machado
Hi @tomgreenwood When we restrict the number of slots to be returned - in Schedule App params (APPT_BOOKING_MAX_OFFERS) and in PSO (the number of slots in appointment templates) - are we restricting both slots that returned with availability true or false, or just the number of slots with availability equal to true?Thank you for your help, Joana Machado
Hi Tom, Thanks for your help. Do you know if it is possible to not receive the slots that are not “Available” in the response message?Thank you!!Joana Machado
Hello,from our understanding it is possible to use the following REST APIs both for appointment templates that are blocking and unblocking:perform_threesixty_appt_offer_accept perform_threesixty_appt_requestIs this correct?Also what is the scenario where the perform_threesixty_appt_offer_reject REST API is used? @martinnc do you have any information related to this?thanks
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
