Skip to main content
Solved

Guidance Needed for Disassembly Process (IFS Cloud 24.1)

  • March 25, 2026
  • 3 replies
  • 37 views

hatice.pariltan
Do Gooder (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hello, I am using IFS Cloud version 24.1. I would like to perform a disassembly process, but there is no disassembly product structure defined. What would be the easiest and most correct way to proceed? Could you please guide me?

Thank you.

Best answer by Lingesan08

Option 1 (Best practice): Create a Disassembly Structure

Even though you don’t have one now, this is the most correct and repeatable solution.

Steps:

  1. Go to Product Structure
  2. Create a structure for the parent part (the item you want to disassemble)
  3. Add components = what you expect to recover
  4. Set:
    • Component quantities
    • Scrap factors (if needed)

Then:

  1. Go to Shop Order
  2. Create a Disassembly Shop Order
  3. Select:
    • The parent part
    • The structure you created
  4. Release and start the order
  5. Report:
    • Receipt of components (output)
    • Issue of the parent (input)

👉 This gives:

  • Traceability
  • Costing accuracy
  • Repeatable process

Option 2: Quick/manual disassembly (no structure)

If this is one-off or ad hoc, you can bypass structures.

Approach:

Use a normal Shop Order (or inventory transactions)

Method A: Shop Order without structure

  1. Create a Shop Order
  2. Do NOT use a structure
  3. Manually:
    • Issue the parent part (negative stock)
    • Receive the components (positive stock)

👉 You may need to:

  • Manually add material lines
  • Or directly report transactions

Method B: Inventory transactions (simplest)

  1. Use:
    • Inventory Part → Issue
    • Inventory Part → Receive
  2. Do:
    • Issue the assembled item out of stock
    • Receive the recovered components into stock

👉 This is fastest but:

  • ❌ No costing logic
  • ❌ No structure traceability
  • ❌ No standard process control

 When to use what

Scenario Recommended Approach
Repeated disassembly ✅ Disassembly structure
Repair/refurb process ✅ Disassembly structure
One-time break-down ⚡ Manual (no structure)
Financial accuracy needed ✅ Structure-based

Important considerations

  • Cost distribution
    Without a structure, you must manually decide how cost is split across components.
  • Serial/lot tracking
    If parts are tracked → always prefer shop order disassembly
  • Quality/repair loops
    Use Shop Orders + Routing if inspection is involved

Pro tip

A very common pattern in IFS:

  • Create a “Disassembly pseudo-structure”
  • Even if approximate
  • Improves:
    • Inventory accuracy
    • Cost tracking
    • Auditability

✔️ Summary

  • No structure → you can do manual disassembly (issue + receive)
  • Best practice → create a disassembly product structure + shop order
  • Choose based on frequency, control, and costing needs

3 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • Answer
  • March 26, 2026

Option 1 (Best practice): Create a Disassembly Structure

Even though you don’t have one now, this is the most correct and repeatable solution.

Steps:

  1. Go to Product Structure
  2. Create a structure for the parent part (the item you want to disassemble)
  3. Add components = what you expect to recover
  4. Set:
    • Component quantities
    • Scrap factors (if needed)

Then:

  1. Go to Shop Order
  2. Create a Disassembly Shop Order
  3. Select:
    • The parent part
    • The structure you created
  4. Release and start the order
  5. Report:
    • Receipt of components (output)
    • Issue of the parent (input)

👉 This gives:

  • Traceability
  • Costing accuracy
  • Repeatable process

Option 2: Quick/manual disassembly (no structure)

If this is one-off or ad hoc, you can bypass structures.

Approach:

Use a normal Shop Order (or inventory transactions)

Method A: Shop Order without structure

  1. Create a Shop Order
  2. Do NOT use a structure
  3. Manually:
    • Issue the parent part (negative stock)
    • Receive the components (positive stock)

👉 You may need to:

  • Manually add material lines
  • Or directly report transactions

Method B: Inventory transactions (simplest)

  1. Use:
    • Inventory Part → Issue
    • Inventory Part → Receive
  2. Do:
    • Issue the assembled item out of stock
    • Receive the recovered components into stock

👉 This is fastest but:

  • ❌ No costing logic
  • ❌ No structure traceability
  • ❌ No standard process control

 When to use what

Scenario Recommended Approach
Repeated disassembly ✅ Disassembly structure
Repair/refurb process ✅ Disassembly structure
One-time break-down ⚡ Manual (no structure)
Financial accuracy needed ✅ Structure-based

Important considerations

  • Cost distribution
    Without a structure, you must manually decide how cost is split across components.
  • Serial/lot tracking
    If parts are tracked → always prefer shop order disassembly
  • Quality/repair loops
    Use Shop Orders + Routing if inspection is involved

Pro tip

A very common pattern in IFS:

  • Create a “Disassembly pseudo-structure”
  • Even if approximate
  • Improves:
    • Inventory accuracy
    • Cost tracking
    • Auditability

✔️ Summary

  • No structure → you can do manual disassembly (issue + receive)
  • Best practice → create a disassembly product structure + shop order
  • Choose based on frequency, control, and costing needs

hatice.pariltan
Do Gooder (Customer)
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Do Gooder (Customer)
  • March 26, 2026

@Lingesan08 Thank you very much for your detailed explanations.🙏🏻


Forum|alt.badge.img+4
  • Do Gooder (Partner)
  • March 26, 2026

@Lingesan08 Thank you very much for your detailed explanations.🙏🏻

       

You’re welcome 🙂
Glad the explanation was helpful.

Please feel free to reach out if you need any further clarification or support. 👍