Topics started by Peshala Fernando
In App 10 testing one of the customer who I am working with, received following error message when trying to copy a project - the dates for the project are within the dates: calendar * has not got enough working days in the period you want to copy the project to! Make sure the calendar is generated for the entire project period
When editing a time entry that is Confirmed by employee and authorized and approved, inconsistent behavior occurred. Editing Invoice comment and internal comment, the Day confirmed flag is removed on both employee company transaction and on customer company transaction, while as the Approved flag is removed on the employee company transaction but it is still on in the customer company transaction.
We've a situation where we want to have raw material at a supplier and also keep track of this. Its sort of a customer consignment stock but at a supplier level instead. In example we want them to keep steel raw material at their site (to guarantee deliveries and because this raw material is quite costly right now) and when we buy a finished steel products from them the consignment stock would have to be adjusted accordingly. Is there are solution for this in IFS today? If yes, can you guide me in the right direction I 'vent been able to find anything in the online documentation.
Hi,Please kindly follow our issue;Manufacturing/Shop Order/Order/Shop OrderIn this window in App10, as shown in the following figure, on the Shop Order page, there is a field for the percentage of expected scrap on the shop order.In the current production conditions in our factory, our products in the shop order are produced with a percentage of rework.Using the percentage of scrap on the shop order instead of percentage of rework will increase the cost of the goods that are produced, while reworking costs are less than the scrap process.In this regard, we want to know how to create shop order for product by considering the percentage of rework.Please kindly let us know your advice;
Delivered customer order appear in project Unfinished Activity Work. Due to business specific, some customer order lines should be only delivered, not invoiced. Customer marks "Invoice Blocked" checkbox in line. But such situation cannot let close the project as in package there is a clause to skip Cancelled and Invoiced lines only.I know the logic behind "Invoice Blocked" that it was designed to stop invoicing temporarily and that it doesn't mean that the order line is excluded from invoicing forever. But in real business life, due to agreements, some order are only delivered and not meant to be invoiced. In such case customer marks "Invoice Blocked" but it prevents closing projects.In Project_Unfinished_Work_API in Check_Unfinished_Objects___ there is a fragment $IF (Component_Order_SYS.INSTALLED) $THEN IF (rec_.proj_lu_name = 'COLINE' AND Customer_Order_Line_API.Get_Objstate(rec_.keyref1, rec_.keyref2, rec_.keyref3, rec_.keyref4) IN ('Invoiced', 'Cancelled')) THE
We use the audit functionality to perform production line audits. NCRs are then created and connected to the audit. Some of these NCRs require action others do not. We would like to be able to close the audit independent of the NCR status. The documentation I've found so far states this is possible, however, it's not allowing us to close the audit's without first closing the NCRs. This is an issue for us because while the audit is complete, the NCR may need to remain open until the non conformity is corrected.Can you please provide documentation on how to close audits with attached NCRs without having to close the NCRs first?Regards,Peshala.
Our Customer needs to know how to update the general overheads charged to shop order based on actual production before closing the shop order because currently it charges overheads based at shop order start based on the original lot size quantity. We need to know how to update the overheads charged based on the complete + scrapped qty without changing the original lost size.
There is an audit query raised by our external auditors (EY) with regard to the closing balance of WIP Account ( GL- 110101002- CA-INV-Work in Progress at Production). As at the year end (31st March 2020) mentioned account has a balance of USD 1,430,630.78. From the audit perspective they are in doubt of identifying a negative balances of USD 189,251.61 (which comprise in 1,430,630.78) in the financial statements in the financial year 2019/20. Major reason for such is to identifying a finished good at an estimate value which will not be 100% accurate against actual cost of the respective shop order. For example :- • Actual Cost '<' Estimated Cost = WIP Credit Balance (Negative Value) • Actual Cost '>' Estimate Cost = WIP Debit Balance (Positive Value) So following elements should be explained. • How the system identify WIP credit Balance? • How the system identify WIP debit balance with respect to zero quantity/minus quantity ? • How the system identify W
The access to expense sheets is controlled by “Position – Access Setup” in IFS. This way, a project manager will be able or not to visualize the expense sheets connected to his/her project depending on the position of the employees. Customer would like that a project manager could have access to all the expense sheets that belonged to his/her own project. The only way knows to achieve this target is enabling all the project managers the access to all the positions. But, if define this way, all the project managers could be able to visualize every expense sheet of any employee in any project, even if they had not access to the project. Customer have tried to define a new “access attribute” adding as a column name a custom field, but it is not included in the value list. Also have tried to define as the “old value” in the “access attribute” a select sentence, but it is considered as an invalid value when try to save it.cannot use an event either because all want is to visualize, not to m
Customer needs to use Kanban but don't want it to move any stock with any Availability Code on that stock. Customer knows there is a setup within Availability Code to "Not Allow" on Part Movement Control, but don't want to stop moving items with an Availability Code. Customer just don't want Kanban to use that stock. Is this something has seen before and is there any way round it. How does it work in IFS10?
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.