This may be standard functionality and something we just need to be aware of, but if we have manually updated a price on a purchase order line and then the line is updated for quantity via purchase order change order, this is also reverting the price for the part back to the price on the supplier for purchase part. The result of this is that it goes unnoticed by the person transacting the change order and later causes an invoicing query when the prcie no longer matches the manually updated price given by the supplier. Is there any way to prevent the change order from reverting to SFPP prices when a change to quantity is made?
Hi all, Is there a menu in Aurena for a full export of manufacturing structure data? In EE there is ’manufacturing structures’ but I cannot locate this in Aurena? Thanks.
Hello, We have an example as below and not sure the most appropriate solution.Site A usually manufactures an item. On occasion due to capacity it is purchased from site B Site B is different company / site in IFS Site A will send all materials for the job to Site BIdea 1The business is already familiar with using distribution orders. However, as the item is manufactured on site A most of the time, shop order requisitions are created. These can be converted to purchase requisitions, but not to a distribution order as far as I can tell? The only way to generate the distribution orders is to manually create or switch the part to ‘purchased’ as default? Idea 2A new concept to the business would be to use inter-site orders using the ‘send’ functionality. This would allow them to leave the part as manufactured and switch to purchase requisition, from which they can then send. We then get the PO/CO although we have to manage the sending when any changes occur. I’m unsure which is the most ap
Hello, Does anyone have an explanation/guide for the statements in the cost message log? Currently have a message ‘Part has been removed from cost structure. Automatic recalculation has been performed.’ Would be helpful to have additional info regarding other messages.
We have created a new cost set and setup identical to cost set 3 for Latest Purchase Price. The only changes I was intending to make is to have different labour rates between the cost sets for a comparison. However, the newly created cost set appears to be posting a large value to ‘estimated material cost’ when a roll up is done, whereas the out of the box cost set 3 sends this value to ‘latest purchase price’ cost bucket. Looking down the tree in our new cost set some of the components have costs against latest purchase price, but others are selecting estimated material cost despite the part having a calculated latest purchase price. How and why is this selection made?
Hello, I have a scenario as follows: Site A (main site) usually manufactures a part, but due to capacity problem wants to send to site B (separate company in IFS). Materials will all be sent from site A free of charge. Site A has been setup primarily as manufactured for the part, but I’ve also setup a purchase part and supplier for purchase part to purchase from site B. When purchasing and sending materials site A are currently used to using the supplier material function in IFS. My question is, can this be used inter-site? How would this generate a PO for component parts at site B end? If that’s not possible I assume I could make the site A purchase structure blank and have them raise a PO on site B. Site B then runs MRP and generates a PO on site A for all of the components. Just means we wouldn’t be using the familiar supplier material process.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
