Hi,Do you mean that loggin on with English language should solve this issue?Or is this a bug? The migration job has been working for a year and suddenly stopped working just now. I worked yesterdayThank you!
Thank you! Unfortunately this does not solve the problem. We are still recieving this error every other day. Does anyone have another solution to the problem?
Thanks! The problem is that the set up is accordingly in the posting control and this only happens to a few persons that has registered time on the same work order as others who its working for correctly. For a few persons it chooses Code E in the accounting posting data and for others it chooses code B and C (which is correct).I can not understand why the set up in the accounting rules doesnt apply to all employees registering time on the same work order
Hi,Ah! Yes of course :)It is transactions from time reporting on work orders.
Thank you! How do configure the posting control to exclude Code E and include Code B and C instead?
I am having the same issue so I’m also interested if someone has a solution for this :)
Hi! Thanks! But that doesnt help me unfortunately :(The case is:Person no 1 creates a work line in the work order, what the need isPerson no 2 adds a resource (Person no 3) to the work lineWhat I want is that Person no 1 gets notified when Person no 2 has assigned Person no 3 as a resource.So it is not the current user who wants to be notified. I thought about the history log to see who Person no 1 is but Im having trouble combining the event with the history log
Thank you Antony! Another “issue” with the Approval routing is how you can remove the approval routing?Lets say that the routing should be activated when a specific field is updated with a specific value, that works with the event. But what if the field is updated with the trigger value but then changed to another value? The approval routing will still be active - Is there a way to “remove” the approval routing automatically then? Hopefully you understand my question :)
Hi again Anthony!I’ve got most of the config correct according to your manuals, thank you so much!But one thing I am wondering if you could help me with - I am trying to set up a stop event but the trigger is for a custom field in the BO but my key is the standard template. Do you know how I can set up an stop event with a trigger that is in the custom template but with a key in the standard template? Thanks!
Ah, amazing thank you!
Thanks what I thought. Thanks for your quick answer!
Thank you Thommy!Another question on the same topic:Do you know if it is possible to have the box unticked but still get the function that all operations rows set to “finished” when the work order is set to “finished”?
Hi!Thank you for your answer!The printer is added as a logical printer and in the config.xml but I can not choose that printer in the Report formatters, that is the issue.When you write “As a windows printer, shared” - Is that a setup in IFS?
Ah that sounds like something we might be able to work with!Im not sure how to exactly set this up - do you have any more detailed instructions of your explaination above? Thank you so much!
Hi!Thank you for the answer @Shehan Almeida My challange here is that, if a person is an authorizer, he or she can remove the authorization line and add another athorizer and that person can authorize the posting proposal. This is of course a problem that basically anyone with the role can authorize the proposal.Is there a way to work with this? We only want persons who are auhtorizers for a specific cost center to have access to authorize posting proposals for that cost center.We thought that the sulotion is to use the Approval Rule. But when someone changes the lines in the Posting proposal to another person there is no Approval Rule to set. It just says “Manually entered” and no rules are applied to whom are eligable to auhtorize the proposal. Hope you understand what I mean :) I have attached a print screen from the Posting porposal. Its in swedish but the column marked in red says “Manually entered or changed” and it is not possible to add an Assignment rule
Hi both! Thank you for your answers!@Rasika Lakmal - But even if I change the UOM in the master part record, the unit will not be updated for the inventory part, right? I’ve tested this and the unit is still the same for the inventory part all though I changes the UOM for the master part record. So I guess i can not be changed after you’ve already created the inventory part with a unit, correct? Thanks!
Thank you both! One last question. Do you know if it is possible to have this check box unticked as default instead of ticked?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
