@Dharshankumaar Mahendran How do I disable the Reference?
Hi @Dharshankumaar Mahendran, I believe I have found what you are saying here.I also tried various values, to see the impact. Where I have originally the link;When I select badge, I get the following; I have found field to be a bit more esthetically pleasing; I was hoping to keep the full text displayed, for users to keep it understandable. I have tried various options, but only the Lookup function displays the description corresponding to the label. How could I achieve the text displayed by lookup to not be an URL? Is this possible?
@Mayura Wasantha Thank you for replying. But the last point/ answer you gave does not completely makes sense to me. I'd rather see the fault type as a sort of filter, to select the fault more directly. Is there something I can do to improve this? Or is this how it is? Our IM department is investigating in implementing a thing he called a “saved search” to filter the Causes linked to a Fault Type.
@LevOrjanM I do not know exactly, but you are able to connect a Template to a Cause. My colleagues abroad tried something below. As far as I know, the Performed Action is an input given by a technician. This is done during reporting in the Work Tasks. This is good to know if you were to analyse performed actions. You can find the input for Performed Actions here @LevOrjanM I hope this helps you a little bit. If you learn anything about linking Templates to Causes and how it works I also would like to know.
@Mayura WasanthaThank you for replying. But the last point/ answer you gave does not completely makes sense to me. I'd rather see the fault type as a sort of filter, to select the fault more directly. Is there something I can do to improve this? Or is this how it is?
So I have made a bit of progress. First off I have to admit, I was working in 2 environments (TEST and LIVE).I now see in LIVE;2 Fault types, as created in FASNa double summary of the causes (the causes are defined exactly the same on both Fault Types) Does it matter what Cause I select? Or is it bound to a Fault Type? Shouldn't there only remain unique Causes, after the Fault Type is admitted? When I select a Cause, from other than the Fault Type, the Fault Type is changed automatically…
@TosohLBlum I am currently setting up the system. My colleague already created a label for Breakdown Maintenance. So my plan was to use this i.c.w. start and stop of work task for reporting downtime. see also below What I further would like to try is to calculate the relative downtime. An action could also be repaired or fail outside the scheduled time. I don't know how, but I think I have to create a calculation with calendar data.
Today I found that the app settings for Edge did not include permission on Camera. After granting access/ permission the camera popped up once again! FYI Machtigingen is Dutch for Permissions
@Drausenhaus, another question. Do you possibly know a way of quickly copying machine history (such as faults/ failures) into IFS? I know of Retrospective Work Reporting, but this seems time consuming.The idea is to have a complete history of our previous maintenance system in IFS, so for future analysis we could e.g. check if failures are more frequent.
@Drausenhaus, it would be possible to go live in PROD. Unfortunately I am not authorized/ able to set up Aurena in PROD. This is a responsibility for another department, which lacks the resources.Additionally my manager aims to go active with a form of IFS Asset Management (be it TEST). Hence my question.
PS; this topic directly relates, but has no sollution for me.Mobile Phone Camera for Media or Attachments in Aurena | IFS Community
I have been playing around with the search query, I am currently able to display Object and Object Description in the search bar. I modified the following;I added the Mch Code (which is equal to Object ID) and MchCodeDescription.Now I wonder if the search could be modified so users could filter on their own names. To prevent a crisscross of Purchase Requisitions.Could someone help me with this?
@EqeRobertKThis seems to work on PM Actions generated via the steps you and @Thommy mentioned. But I get no results on PM Actions or WTT's connected via PM Programs.The only way to update the PM Actions in PM Programs is to; But by doing so the Start Value is changed. This is sensitive to errors. Especially, when certain objects have intervals of longer periods (up to 20 years in our case).So my question remains, is it possible to update PM Programs, without modifying the Start Value?
@Thommy Following your steps to create a PM Action I am able to select a couple of options. (see below)This works when the PM Action is Preliminary and Active.The revision also is pulled through to the Active PM Action. Could this have something to do with PM Programs. As we are using this method to attach multiple Work Task Templates to multiple Objects?When I create a new revision on a Work Task Template used in PM Programs and PM Actions I get this message.
@Thommy,As far is I can tell, it is the following.I am testing this function in the test environment by the way.In the example I sent, I did the following;create new revision on work task template modify job description save modification set task template status from Preliminary to Active RMB header, options stay grayed outI have made earlier attempts using the “Replace Obsolete Work Task Templates on PM Actions” function. But after creating new revisions (and not using “Replace” function) I keep getting the grayed out options.
@Thommy, As I stated in my original note, the status of the Work Task Template does not seem to be of influence. So I found the thread and was hopeful to try to change the Work Task Template via RMB on the header. Unfortunately, I am unable to try this due to the fact it keeps being grayed out. Several tests later, trying out new revisions, status changes. I remain unable to select these options. So as we say in Dutch, Unfortunately Peanutbutter.
I have found that you are able to adjust search menu's. I am now able to look only for objects, unfortunately the object description does not pull through for some reason. Can anyone help me to pull the Object Description through?left the editor panelBelow the “Advanced” search
@anmise, Good news I am able to display a list of all Work Tasks or Task Steps, using “List” and a combination of a Term containing Task/Work. However, I find the following;All values (tasks/works) are shown (also see image) In List I am unable to change the statusCould you help me to a guide to adjust the interface? There is a lot of options here, and it would take quite some time to try them all.
@anmise How do I add a tab?I am a user of the system, I am not that familiar with programming. We do have support internally for programming, but their time is limited.
@paul harland I have explored the maintenance section a bit further, I have found something that comes near the overview I desire. However, I don't think this window/interface is easy to use for technicians. Due to all of the possibilities in this window, e.g. assigning, status changes, etc. Do you think we could turn this into a workable/ simpler interface for technicians? And in general, could perhaps advice how we can use/ improve the use of the Maintenance Engineer lobby?Finally, as you mentioned “the one-to-many issue”, could you perhaps tell me about the future plans for Aurena? Thanks in advance!
@KrishanthaRutterKey I just found out that under Work Task Transactions the labels used in Equipment Object Cost/Revenue Analysis are free for selection as a Transaction Type. (see below) Now I can see the Transaction Type directly correlates to the time spent on a Work Order. And the standard Transaction Type being Personnel. I have 2 questions on this;Is it possible to automate certain Transaction Types? (I have also found you can pre-select certain types in the Work Task Template, below Planning)Unfortunately, I have not found out a way to save this to a Work Task Template.Under Valid For Sites/Planning I am unable to select anything from a dropdown.When I enter a Maintenance Purchase Requisition, I do not see how it would be categorized as I have found at the Work Task Transactions. Would these requisitions/ Purchase Orders also be visible under Work Task Transactions/Equipment Object Cost/Revenue Analysis when fully executed (ordered etc.)? Thanks in advance!
Is there a way for technicians to jump from the assignment to the new requisition page?We would like to enable technicians to easily issue No Part Requisitions for upkeep/ maintenance activities. But for technicians to navigate through this maze seems a bit much. I hope the image below gives some clarity.
@Nethmini Kosvinna,Thanks for your reply.Could you explain to me how labels such as; material, personnel, expenses, etc. would be generated? Is this done via Requisition Lines? Pre-posting? Or in another manner? Additionally, could you explain to me where equipment purchase cost (Acquisition Cost) is used? As I cannot find it in the Equipment object cost/revenue analysis.Kind regards,Wout
Hello! So I'm discovering Aurena and the Service And Maintenance module. I'm happy I found this thread, as it already has given me some clarity. I do however still have questions relating to this topic.Ideally I would like the service technician to directly jump into a screen where they can input “No Part Requisition Lines”, automatically backed up with the info from the Work Order.Could someone please help me, as I don't see a possibility currently how this would normally work. Below are some screenshots with some explanation complementary to my request/ question above.Start screen technician Work details, jump to requisitions After clicking Requisitions, you are directly navigated to New Purchase Request. You are not able to deviate or change to something similar to No Part Purchase Requisition. I found in this thread you are able to create Purchase Requisitions, however you need to search the corresponding Work Order. Additionally whereas the Purchase Request generates a requisition
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
