Assets (Asset Management)

Hi FolksWhat is the most convenient way to manage team/crew members? Is the Resource Navigator the only tool? For example, 5 teams/brigades of 2-3 people go to the field every day, but the composition of the teams may change every day. Maybe some mobile solution for the composition of the team management? 

there is an requirements that multiple activities should be added to one work order. reason behind this is there will be dependencies for activities.Can we create from a project activities like Act1, Act2 etc...as work tasks(1,2 etc..) and add to one work order. any possibilities to match the above requirements.  

 I am trying to configure navigation from Prepare Work Order (Active Separate) screen to History Log screen and pass WO_NO as a filter. When navigating from Prepare Work Order, the History Log should show records only for that specific WO number. I tried using navigation filter like:startswith(tolower(Keys),'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^')), Keys contains 'wo_no eq ($[WoNo])^'))But it is not returning the expected records. History Log stores WO number inside the KEYS field, so I am trying to filter based on that value.What is the correct navigation filter expression to pass WO_NO from Prepare Work Order to History Log?If anyone has implemented similar navigation filtering for KEYS field, please suggest the correct approach.Keys: WO_NO=2^Also, I need to filter History Log records where:LU Name = ApprovalRouting Since the KEYS field contains multiple key references like:KEY_REF=WO_NO=2^LINE_NO=1^LU_NAME=ActiveSeparate^STEP_NO=10^ I need to understand how to correctly pass WO_NO (and other key refe

How to the Estimated Life of an object from 25Y to 10Y

As part of our upgrade to IFS Cloud, we are considering replacing our external field solution with the Maintenance Technician Portal.Selecting the correct functional object by scanning a barcode or QR code with an iPhone or iPad is critical. With more than 2,000 users, the solution must be simple and reliable.Has anyone found a good solution for this?

Hello all,My customer uses GL and a depreciation voucher only affecting GL; The IL has been implemented at the same time as the GL but never used. They want to start using IL and have accumulated depreciation of object registered for the past years in IL for the object.The purchase of object was registered in 2016 in both IL and GL, and existing depreciation was only posted to GL I would like to update accumulated depreciation for existing objects in IL (estimated life is longer for objects in IL, same method) Since object is not in the registered status, I cannot use the "import object" functionality. I tried using the external file template "ExtFAObjectImport" to import accumulated depreciation on IL for each year from 2016 to 2024 but the error shows "object already exists" on the log analyis Do you know if it is possible to import accumulated depreciation on internal ledger only for existing objects? I thought the other alternative would be to adapt base value and reduce it accordi

Hi all, my maintenance team wants to add a lot of technical specification on Serial object, technical data screen. Since this requires a lot of typing, they asked if we could migrate this. The view name where this needs to be migrated is TECHNICAL_SPEC_NUMERIC however, in migration job I do not see how this is connected to Serial object ID, or technical object reference (basically missing how to ensure migration imports data to right serial object). Does anyone have experience with this kind of migration and how to complete it? 

Hello,Maybe someone could answer those questions:When did the statuses “Not Translated” and “Changed” appear for the attribute in the form “Text Translations”? For example, such attributes where never translated and never changed their translations in the environment, but they are seen with the status “Changed”: Why some attributes in statuses “Not Translated” and “Changed” exist in the form “Text Translations” and “Translatable Text” at the same time?

An Object was moved from CIP to Equipment and then we received a credit from the vendor.  The credit is sitting in CIP as a negative.  How do I get this out of CIP and applied to the original asset?  I have tried to add value to the object along with adding a child to the object and the message is “the value can’t be a negative number.”  What is the best way to accomplish this?

Hello,I'm looking for information, documentation, implementation references for an additional Linear Asset lifecycle management solution with Map Service (ArcGIS) that complements the existing IFS Cloud functionality centered on point-based assets in GIS Object Configuration.I would be grateful if you could share any relevant information. Best regards,E.Mamcasz

Hello, Please help me with assistance in MWO to create additional work task for the work order.I tried to create via “New Work”, but it creates Work Order with status Fault Report:I tried to create via “Additional Work” and it creates work task that I cannot found in the system and WO and Work Task numbers are very strange:I cannot find such Work Tasks in IFS Cloud application with such Mobile Task ID:Thank you beforehand:)

Hello, maybe someone also met the problem, that in the same form number separators (number formats) differ. For example, I met such situation in the form Material Requisition. One is separated by point, other by comma:computer settings: 

Hello all,We have 1 customer that is very adamant on getting a special test on their Quotes, Order Confirmations and Invoices (at least same text always!).We are still on Apps9, heading for Cloud soon’ish…I’ve tried via Document text, notes etc. But nothing will print automatic on all. We want to avoid having to manually add that Document Text on every single order.Isn’t there a way to get a specific text printed on all documents for that 1 Customer?Thank you,Michael

I have a customer case looking in IFS Cloud to find a functionality/solution to replace Support Issue that exists in App 10. As far as I understand, Support Issue has been replaced by Call Center - however the quick and easy workflow has somewhat disappeared.Even if Call Center has some good processes, its too complex and admin heavy when just wanting to create a quick issue that requires a swift and easy solution and just keeping a log of what has been done.I have looked at perhaps using Change Request - but then the application moves into Engineering which is not really the correct scope.So, my question is:Will Support Issue be re-implemented in Cloud? If not, what options are there to be close to the Support Issue functionality but instead in Cloud?Kindest regards,Johanna 

Maintenance Planning Board in 23R1. Hi there has anyone got any videos or info on MPB available. Thanks

We are implementing IFS Apps 10 - Aurena UPD 11 and we need to know the output from below 3 listed reports. However The Report 1 has the Input parameter as "Task Index Seq" which is not available in any of the screens OR through LOVs in input parameter and the Reports 2 & 3 are fetching blank outputs and doesn't provide feasibility to enter input parameters.Could you please provide the overview for below three reports in IFS Maintenance ;1- Work Task Index2 - Work Order Index3 - Work Order Operations IndexAppreciate the feedback if anyone has come across these reports.

Community,We are on APP10/UPD9, We are using Create Repair Work Order Assistant to create repair work order when it is requested. One thing quite annoying is, Work Type is automatic fetched into Repair Work Order and we must manually enter both on header and task level.For normal work order or service request, we are using Service Contract so system auto fetch the work type to work order.Kindly advise where we could set up default work type for Repair Work Order?Thank you.

Large asset- and fleet-intensive organisations often operate the same type of assets across multiple sites and legal entities, while managing them through a common maintenance and fleet organisation. Today, FAM does not fully support this operating model, which makes it difficult to use FAM as an enterprise-wide solution for customers with complex organisational structures.FAM should support multiple companies and multiple sites within the same FAM implementation, aligned with the standard multi-company and multi-site capabilities available elsewhere in IFS Cloud.The capability should allow users to manage fleets/assets belonging to different companies and sites while maintaining the appropriate company/site ownership, financial context, security and user access. Users with the appropriate permissions should be able to work across those organisational boundaries without having to maintain separate FAM structures or duplicate configuration.This is particularly important for industries s